Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday744
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday681

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

" In the long run, men hit only what they aim at. Therefore, they
had better aim at something high. "

Henry David Thoreau


Men's News

Justification of crime – A Betrayal of Justice PDF Print E-mail
Written by Virag   
Monday, 08 June 2009 16:57

That crime against men are grossly under-reported in the media, is a fact since National Crime Records Bureau says 92 % of crimes are Crimes Against Men, yet the media is filled with horrific stories of crime against women which consists of merely 6.38% of the total crimes. However, there is one more dangerous aspect related to crime against men when it comes to reporting.

That aspect pertains to the judgmental syndrome reflected in the choice of language chosen to portray the incident of crime against men. The entire crime is presented as if the crime that has happened was the only outcome possible of the entire scenario and the ‘victim' man who has been at the receiving end of the crime is projected as a criminal.

Wives's murdering their husbands has become a fashion these days. But a gruesome aspect of truth is the way these murders are projected in the media reportings. First of all, the husband is shown as an ‘Abusive and Alcoholic' husband on a de-facto basis. And that de-facto assumption is used to ‘justify' the gruesome and cold-blooded murder. To add to further to it, instead of condemning the wife for the gruesome act, CAB (cock and bull) stories are written about the ‘alleged and assumed' torture the wife underwent before murdering the husband. Furthermore, since the man is already dead, there is no way the allegations can be corroborated and statements from the cold blooded murderer wife are taken as GOSPEL TRUTH.

In its over-enthusiastic bid to pamper women, media is forgetting that the wife has cold-bloodedly murdered the husband and justifying such a murder based on the statements of the murderer wife is nothing less than BETRAYAL OF JUSTICE.

Conversely, when there is a report of a wife being murdered by the husband, the husband is always projected as a torturous aggressor and the wife is an innocent, gullible and docile victim. Now when feminists and women Pamperers are talking of so called, "Gender Equality", why is the same concept not applied in case of crime reportings, condemnation of crimes committed by women, responsibility, punishment and portrayal of abuse against men and women?

Equality is not a luxury that you wear it when your mood is good and shed it off if the mood is bad. Equality is a fundamental right and every citizen (whether male or female) has a right to equality which applies to all spheres of life. Fundamental rights are for everyone or they are for none. There can never be a selective distribution of Fundamental Rights based on the whims and fancies of vested interests. Such open and visible bias and discrimination against men and unleashing of male hatred is, by no stretch of imagination, either Gender Equality or Women Empowerment.

When crimes against men are openly justified by projecting their murderer wives as LIBERATED VICTIMS justice is openly murdered in broad day light, men's rights movement is the call of the day because Justification of crime is a Betrayal of Justice and that cannot be tolerated. Crime is crime and punishment has to be irrespective of gender, caste and creed. Merely a perception of weak gender and a presumption of over-propagated victimhood can never become the basis of reduced punishment for crimes.

Crime can never be justified; otherwise every criminal should be let off free since no one commits crime sans compulsion or without reason. If alleged and assumed torture can be used to justify crimes done by women, then why are men kept devoid of this luxury? This is Gender Bias and Gender Equality is needed here also. Hence it is a choice with the society and the media as well - It can either equate punishment for crime or liberty to commit crime for both the genders.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share