Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday766
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday681

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

"

Women are wiser than men because,

they know less and understand more.

"

James Thurber


Men's News

Castration of the Initiator : A social service PDF Print E-mail
Written by Virag   
Tuesday, 07 July 2009 16:06

In continuation with my arguments in Look before you leap; Learn before you Love, wherein I have warned men from initiating relationships without knowing their lady love, I will today tell how does the practice not only harms men, but also sets dangerous social trends. As the great men of society have been bestowed upon with titles like the Protector and the Provider which has formed the crux of the male identity since centuries, it also brings another identity trait and that being of an Initiator.

The concept of initiation actually comes from the existing male identity of a Protector and a Provider and the expectation of Responsibility arising from therein. Because it is the man who's supposed to don the roles mentioned, he also assumes the inherent and implicit role of an initiator.

It is not uncommon to see a man initiating relationships (although there have been exceptions). It is also not uncommon for the society to expect so from the man. Because of the initiatives taken by the man, the turmoil in the relationship is also attributed to the man who is held responsible for the relationship failure and is penalized based on assumptions.

Already the mistake committed by the man by exhibiting the Raj Syndrome explained in Look before you leap; Learn before you Love; lands him in an unanticipated situation and he exhibits frustration which is considered as violence from the man and not accepted. In such a situation even if the woman is guilty, gets the compensation in terms of sympathy and otherwise; while the initiator is held responsible for everything and penalized.

Such a social trend is very dangerous and allows vicious and unscrupulous women to trap innocent men and make a fortune by extorting him. Such psychological sensibilities also form the basis of gender obsessed laws (in favor of women) along with their purported misuse leading to double jeopardy for men in cases where innocent and victimized men are made to pay the price of the Initiator Syndrome.

Unaware that they are victims of a conspiracy theory, men mostly take things lying down which again leads to another social meme that abuse of men is OK. It does not take a while for things to escalate and no sooner the abuse reaches phenomenal levels rendering it unfit to be called abuse, it rather gets promoted to Castration.

Due to non-opposition, Castration of the Initiator looks like a Social Service. Adds fuel to the fire, the fact there is no concept of men's rights. Even highly placed constitutional, unconstitutional and extra-constitutional bodies feel that there is no need for men's rights because it is the initiator who is responsible for his abuse. Society refuses to take responsibility for its men with this Castrate Initiator Syndrome working in the background, whereas the society takes full responsibility of its women again with Castrated by the Initiator Syndrome working in background.

One more path leading to liberation of men is to stop taking initiatives and enjoy life. No initiation means no castration and slowly the reality of Castration of the Initiator being a social service will cease to exist and will disappear into oblivion.

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
jinesh zaveri  - well written.     |59.182.31.xxx |08-07-2009 15:27:09
men are ok when women abuse male lot in general. infact they support women while they abuse male lot in general.


women are simply not ok when in general also they are critisiced. infact they again abuse male lot in return. and
males may switch sides.

thus they are better strategised.

males have been responsible for this day.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share