Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday263
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday877

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

"

There's only one thing money won't buy,

and that is poverty.

"

Joe E. Lewis


Men's News

Amnesty International - Rape Crisis in Sweden PDF Print E-mail
Written by Robert Franklin, Esq   
Thursday, 07 May 2009 18:34

Source

This article says a lot about a certain mindset regarding issues surrounding rape allegations (The Local, 4/28/09).  It comes to us from Sweden.

Apparently Sweden, which is widely acknowledged to be one of the most gender equal countries on earth, has been scored by Amnesty International for failing to convict more rape defendants.  During one year, about 3,500 rapes were reported to police, but only about 13% resulted in "a decision to start legal proceedings."  What the actual conviction rate was, the article doesn't say.

The article goes on to say that, over the past 20 years, rape allegations reported to the police have quadrupled.  It also reports that Swedes are now more likely to be the victim of a sex crime than a robbery.  And, although only 3,500 rapes were reported, actually some 30,000 occurred. The tone of the article is urgent and alarming.  The headline states that Amnesty International finds that "Swedish rapists enjoy impunity."  In short, according to the article, Sweden is little short of a rapist's paradise in which women refuse to report rapes and when they do a callous judicial system is loathe to pursue the offenders.

Really?  If reports of rape have quadrupled in 20 years, how can the article claim that women don't come forward with their claims?  I suppose it's theoretically possible that, over the same 20 years that incidents of rape have more than quadrupled, but I doubt it. 

After all, if that were the case, how to explain the fact that, according to the 2008 Swedish Crime Survey only 1% of Swedes had been exposed to a sex crime of any sort (how many of those were rapes isn't reported)?  How to explain the statement in the same report that "Swedes are in general a secure people.  Worry about being subjected to crime oneself is fairly unusual."?

Isn't it barely possible that the greatly increased public awareness of crimes of all sorts against women over the past 20 years has resulted in the increase in reports of rape?  Isn't it also possible that many of those are either false claims or claims of such dubious legal merit that prosecutors can't pursue them?

Speaking of false claims, that concept is nowhere mentioned in the article.  After all, a 13% indictment rate strongly suggests one of two things, weak evidentiary cases (for whatever reason), or prosecutors who don't care that rapists walk free.  The article chooses the latter and utterly ignores the former.  But in a country that has outstripped almost all others in its quest for gender equality, there are bound to be Swedish "Wendy Murphys," i.e. female prosecutors with a bent for rape cases. 

So I'm not buying the article's conclusion that prosecutors aren't serious about rape allegations.  That opinion is buttressed again by the Swedish Crime Survey that shows that Swedes have high confidence in the police and the judicial system.  If those institutions were as bad on rape allegations as the article claims, would they? 

Hewing none to close to traditional notions of journalism, the writer neglected to ask any officials of the Swedish judicial system their opinions of how rape allegations are dealt with or how seriously they're taken.  The article offers actual members of that system no opportunity to explain, correct or give context.  Might they, for example, have an explanation for the 13% indictment rate in rape claims?  Is there a good reason or is it just perfidy on the part of all concerned?

Oh, and the article's claim that sex crimes outnumber robberies is wrong.  All sex crimes combined affect only 1% of Swedes, while robberies affect 4-7%.

What must be the most bizarre aspect of the article is the claim by a United Nations report that it is gender equality itself that results in women not coming forward to report rape.  Gender equality, we are told, far from empowering women to report rape, more than ever causes them to fear "public shame - being regarded as a tragic failure in a country of supposed gender equality."

So there you have it; lack of gender equality is bad because it deprives women of the self-esteem to report rape, and gender equality is bad for the same reason.  Eurasia is no longer the enemy of Oceania; East Asia is the enemy of Oceania and always has been.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share