Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday359
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday877

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

" The conception of two people living together for twenty-five years without having a cross word suggests a lack of spirit only to be admired in sheep. "

Alan Patrick Herbert


Men's News

Do we need any law to protect women - Part II PDF Print E-mail
Written by Virag   
Thursday, 10 December 2009 16:15

Continued from....

Most of the feminist literature and feminist theory have been the backbone of the bias and discrimination against men and it is based on a single psychological syndrome which is the "Victim Women Criminal Men" syndrome. And based on this, all the women protection laws have given the sole testimony of the complainant woman a weight-age equal to Level 1 evidence - enough to convict the accused in legal parlance.

And this in itself is the key to the paradox. The entire criminal justice system of receiving complaints, investigating them and collecting evidence and facts to corroborate them are based on the sole principle that, "No innocent should ever be punished' as the possibility of filing a false complaint to settle individual scores can never be ruled out and there has to be sufficient protection mechanism against the same.

However, in case of women laws, by assuming that all complainant women are victims and all accused men (and other women related to the accused man) are criminals and extrapolating it to assuming that a woman will not lie unless compelled and a man unless proven innocent will not be spared; is a clear violation of the fundamental basis of the establishment of the "Criminal Justice System". And such a system can neither provide justice to women nor men. It will only help criminal women take advantage of innocent men and that is exactly what is happening now. If that was the real hidden feminist agenda then they are successful. Choice lies with them to decide.

Anjali also peeves on two more fronts,

1.    She is disturbed that the Domestic Violence Act is being blamed of misuse.

2.    She vouches that every problem of women can be solved by law.

Let me console her by telling her that the Domestic Violence is not all being misused. The Act was designed to extort men and throw them out of their own homes and it is exactly being used for that. The way the Act is designed and relies so heavily on the complainant woman's whims and fancies and statements, it is completely deficient in addressing to Domestic Violence. And it is not only inter-gender discriminatory but also intra-gender discriminatory as it exempts one set of men from punishment and deprives a set of women from protection as well. However, I will not go into details about this, the fact remains that the current form of the Domestic Violence Act in India is not at all being misused; it is exactly being used with the hidden agenda with which it was designed. However, the portrayal of the Act may deviate from reality and this might be concern for the credibility of women and feminists in turn as it is credibility on which they harp, survive and grow unchallenged.

 

As for formulating laws for addressing women's problems, there are quite some pitfalls as mirrored in Lao Tzu's statement, that, "The more laws and order are made prominent,
The more thieves and robbers there will be." And the feminist ideology of designing laws has already been dissected. Also, the laws designed as per feminist ideology have already shown their dismal performance, every year, the tone of the feminist get shriller, "Crime against women is increasing" and the irony of the fact is that they use unproven complaints as basis of growth indicator!

Continued at....

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :

Do we need any law to protect women - Part II
Thursday, 10 December 2009

© 2012 - We Men


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share