Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday384
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday877

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

"

There's only one thing money won't buy,

and that is poverty.

"

Joe E. Lewis


Men's News

Study: Competent Fathers Lower Mom's Self-Esteem PDF Print E-mail
Written by Robert Franklin, Esq.   
Sunday, 21 March 2010 06:15
When mothers perceived fathers to be competent caregivers, the more time those dads spent solo with children, the lower was mom's self-competence rating.

 

That's from this report on a soon-to-be-published study of parents and their attitudes toward each other's parenting styles (LiveScience, 3/18/10).  Conducted by Osaka University of Commerce researcher, Takayuki Sasaki and colleagues at the University of Texas, the study was an interview of employed parents with eight-month-old infants.

Interview questions measured two types of self-esteem – self-liking and self-competence (the degree to which individuals feel capable of and effective in accomplishing goals).

During home visits, parents were also asked to talk about their spouse's strengths and weaknesses. Coders then watched video recordings of the discussions and rated each participant's perceptions of his or her spouse's parenting, which included the spouse's emotional engagement (kissing and hugging the baby), physical involvement (such as feeding and diaper changing), responsibility and overall parenting skills. Total scores ranged from the worst score of 4 to the highest of 28.

Mothers cared for children alone about three times as much as did fathers alone, and for that dads gave them high parenting marks averaging 24.  Mothers generally approved of fathers' parenting too, although to a lesser degree.  Dads rate an average score of 21 from moms.

But, as we've seen in maternal gatekeeping, often mothers approved of fathers' parenting because it was like theirs.  When dads deviate from mothers' expectations, they tend to get criticized.  So,

"Many wives would say care-giving by their husbands is helpful but at the same time wives give their husbands negative feedback because their husbands' care-giving style is different from their own," Sasaki told LiveScience.

A bit ironically,

When mothers perceived fathers to be competent caregivers, the more time those dads spent solo with children, the lower was mom's self-competence rating.

So mothers want fathers to take part in childcare and want them to conform to their expectations, but when dads do that, and particularly when they do it a lot and well, mothers' self-esteem takes a hit.  In short, mothers tend to be ambivalent about paternal involvement with and care of children.  Though Sasaki doesn't seem to notice it, that surely plays a role in dads' lesser involvement in childcare.

But Sasaki places the blame squarely on cultural norms, saying,

"In American society, women are expected to take a main role in parenting despite increasingly egalitarian sex roles," Sasaki said. "Thus, we believe that employed mothers suffer from self-competence losses when their husbands are involved and skillful because those mothers may consider that it is a failure to fulfill cultural expectations."

But there's a lot more to it than cultural constructions, as Sasaki ought to know.  As I've pointed out before, the connection nature provides between parents and children of all mammal and most bird species is hormonal.  Specifically, females produce elevated levels of three principal hormones, cortisol, prolactin and oestradiol, during pregnancy.  Those have been shown to produce parenting behavior, even in adults without offspring.

The reason those hormones are required is that mammal and avian offspring require a lot of time to mature and socialize before they can take care of themselves.  Unlike reptiles, they need not only parents, but parenting.  So those hormones create the protective caregiving required for offspring to mature.

Adult mammals that don't have those hormonal spikes, like male African lions, exhibit no parental behavior toward offspring.  Those that do, do.  And parenting behavior reflects not only the presence of those hormones, but their serum levels as well.  As far as we know, the higher the levels, the greater involvement in parenting.

That's true irrespective of the sex of the parent.  In most species, the mother is the primary caretaker, but in certain New World monkeys, it's the dad who get's the, er, lion's share of the three hormones, and sure enough, he does most of the childcare.

In humans, mothers show higher levels of the three hormones during pregnancy and, not surprisingly, do most of the childcare.  Fathers who are present during their partner's pregnancy have increased levels of cortisol, prolactin and oestradiol, but not to the extent that mothers do.  Humans are a bi-parental species, with mothers being the primary caregivers.

So Sasaki's claim that parental roles are all about culture is wrong.  Culture of course is part of the story, but only part.

Still, the study is worthwhile.  It again points up the fact that, as much as we say we want gender equality in all things, that may not be entirely true.  Women want to be mothers and they tend to want that more than men want to be fathers.  There's nothing about gender equality that shouldn't allow individuals of both sexes the freedom to fulfill their own needs.  But right now both men and women find themselves in a whirl of mixed messages, with men's need to be providers competing with women in the workplace and women's need to care for children forcing men out of the nursery.

Thanks to Larry for the heads-up.

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share