Share N Subscribe

Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

Community Center for men

If you are a man with a marital problem, visit Confidare India Men's Rights Community Center for guidance and coaching. Call +91 90083 02822

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday427
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday877

Poll

Do you think men have a right to peaceful existence?
 

Meaningful Quotes

" Every man is the architect of his own fortune. "

Sallust


Men's News

Ignoring screeches, espousing sneezes PDF Print E-mail
Written by Virag   
Tuesday, 14 September 2010 16:00

As I read this news, "Wife gets bail in hubby torture case", once again the bias that exists in the Indian judiciary, against Indian men in general and husbands in particular comes to the fore.

Going by the data of National Crime Records Bureau, in the last 5 years i.e. 2004 - 2008, close to 5.5 Lakh innocent men have been arrested without any trial or investigation, merely on the complaints by their wives under the unconstitutional Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. And in a majority of these cases, the husbands have been denied "Anticipatory Bail", citing the reason that, "granting a bail may cause serious harm to the wife."

It is pertinent to mention here that all these cases under Section 498A are taken at face value and no investigation is done to verify the tenacity of the allegations. Not only that, all these allegations are taken out straight from a "Harassment Template" with standard set of allegations and accusations.

Nevertheless, in this particular case, the wife has been granted bail merely because she is a WOMAN.

Who will ensure the husband's safety if the wife is let out on bail, given the fact that the husband attempted suicide exasperated with the physical/emotional torture from wife and in-laws.

When a wife files a complaint, mere tears from the woman are enough to deny a husband and his family the constitutional right of bail, whereas in this case, the struggle of the husband in his attempts to get justice and the fact that he has attempted suicide makes no difference to the insensitive judiciary and the accused wife is granted bail merely because she is a WOMAN.

Is the judiciary passing out the clear message with such orders, that for a man even his life-attempting screeches aren't enough for him to get justice whereas for a woman, a sneeze is enough to even get a bail after committing the crime of torturing her husband?

Is the judiciary ignoring screeches of men in order to espouse sneezes of women?

Will the judiciary answer?

No wonder the judiciary is responsible for the 58000 husbands sacrificed at the altar of marriage and society.
Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :

Ignoring screeches, espousing sneezes
Tuesday, 14 September 2010

© 2012 - We Men


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments
Add New
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 


Related Articles:


Sneak A Peek

Men’s Rights – Perspiration or Inspiration?

As I think about the today's theme - it reminds me of Thomas Edison, the man who invented the electric bulb. He had made a famous statement "Things are 99% perspiration, 1% inspiration"

Same applies to men's rights movement as well. It is a matter of constant awareness campaign and hitting at our opponents and proponents of male abuse. Contrary to popular belief, it is 3 times easier to abuse a male than a female because males have no support structure and male abuse is accepted by the society as social service.

Read more...
Follow Yourself; Not Tradition

As I have repeatedly mentioned in my articles that cultures have deceived men, acting as vultures. Men have been used as the FREE ATM MACHINE, the UNPAID BODYGUARD, the de-facto PROTECTOR and PROVIDER, etc. by cultures and in the process have been reduced to disposable entities. Their abuse is considered a social service now.

And men, the way they are, are in a great way responsible for this. They rarely challenge or question conventions, traditions, histrionics and stereotypes thrust upon them. They do not feel the need to fight for their rights - only a handful of them are doing though scores are getting victimized. They do not demand for their space in the society and accept things as offered to them.

To this effect, today I take the example of Skandagupta - the great emperor of India. His stepmother has him sent to Ujjain so that her son can be made the emperor. He obeys her. But then the Huns attack India under the leadership of Attila the Hun. The army of Skandagupta calls him back as they needed his expertise.

Read more...
Update me when site is updated Bookmark and Share